Latest version of FireGPG installed... Same behaviour...
1 2008-01-28 15:52:15
Re: Invalid signature created according to Mutt (6 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)
2 2008-01-25 20:25:40
Re: Invalid signature created according to Mutt (6 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)
#4 Exactly!
And my feeling and experience have always been that Mutt and gpg are 100% compatible...
3 2008-01-15 16:13:35
Re: Invalid signature created according to Mutt (6 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)
A Linux box, using just one version of gpg installed as /usr/bin/gpg...
4 2008-01-09 13:22:35
Topic: Invalid signature created according to Mutt (6 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)
I just downloaded FireGPG and I am giving it a try. It would be great for me to have full GPG availability using Gmail!
Then I create a first message, sign it using my key and send it to a test account. I move to Gmail sent mail, open the message just sent, and it tells the signature is valid. However I download the message to the other account, open Mutt, view the message, run the check-traditional-pgp function, and then mutt tells the signature is invalid. If I copy the body of the message shown by mutt and pass it to gpg --verify on the same machine, the signature is agreed as valid. So Mutt, who always worked lovely with gpg, now seems failing.
Any ideas?