851

(1 replies, posted in Requests)

Hum.... ok, but it's not very urgent.. (added to todolist)

Can't work for Windows users, can't work with special chars.

853

(4 replies, posted in Requests)

Why tried to use the enigmail functions, but there were too complicated...

But it's planned, after we have a full OpenGPG/Mime support for gmail.

So... wait smile

854

(1 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

No, I aws just me who forget to active two check box !

Fixed, thanks for the report !

855

(3 replies, posted in New versions)

Retry now, it's maybe the server who was down in a litte momement...

856

(14 replies, posted in gpgAuth)

We have posted a write-up that talks about what gpgAuth is and how it works.  You can visit it here: http://www.gpgauth.com/#what_how

We are working on getting a writeup that explains how to implement it. It should be available sometime Monday, June 25th, 2007.

The forums are open now as well, so feel free to ask some questions.

The gpgAuth Team - www.gpgauth.com

857

(7 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

Ok, so we don't do anythings...

Closed !

858

(7 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

Ok, but we can maybe remove this chars...

859

(7 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

So:

With outlook (web access), there are some strange characters into the mesage, who fail validations of sign.
With a copy/past who ignore this special char, the sign are valid.

It's only signs of FireGPG ?

You speak about the editor ? Be can't use any other box (it's included into FireFox), and it's work with all UTF-8 characters...

861

(20 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

That good ! I add a bug report for the edit on our slide !

862

(20 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

And it's remove the problem of sign inside signs ?

INV_RECP 10 mean you not trust the key, use your keymanager to change hit !

864

(20 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

1) Can you me more clear ?
2) Can you stop doing a lot of double-post ? You can edit your messages.

865

(7 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

Can you be more clear ?

866

(9 replies, posted in New versions)

sid77 wrote:

firegpg is behaving really badly about security

Yes, so when we fix the smalls problem like the files with password, we need to upgrade very fast ^^.

But we will implement, you're 3 against me ^^.

867

(9 replies, posted in New versions)

> You're basically saying there's an important update, but not so important that I shouldn't restart Firefox?

There an difference between 1 day and 1 week.

> you're forcing them to be back on

No, there are two 'cancel' buttons big_smile.

> I don't understand. You won't be updating the package in the Debian repository? I believe that will get your package quickly removed from the repository.

No, but for sample, I the package came to ubuntu's repository, some old repository aren't updated....


For the option, we will see.

868

(9 replies, posted in New versions)

camrdale ->

- You aren't have to restart FF I you will restart it later...
- Maybe you update as fast a possible, but not every body, there are some users who simply turn off the updates.
- With debian package, old repository versions will not be updated.

FireGPG is in developpment. There can have security issue, and we need to update as fast as possible. Wee WANT to haven't any users with a old version, so we will make all for this.

I contact you by PM.

869

(20 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

Stop make strange files ^^

870

(20 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

Witch file ? The inside sign ? Yes.

871

(20 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

Already reported.

872

(9 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

Try with a stupid password (like 123) and look if it's work...

873

(3 replies, posted in New versions)

Small update for locates :

- Fix problem with pl locate.
- pl, tr, de, pt updated
- ca added
- (Notice) gpgAuth is now implemented, for developpment

874

(9 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

We can send you a special version of FireGPG who do this...

With gpg, it's work ?

My message was not again you, I'm sorry if I was rude,  it's just that is the 2000th same question ^^ ! But that show it's important !

(But that your report was already repoted, we have a lot of document from SomeBody who seem to tested.. all big_smile)

Thanks for your help !