1

(3 replies, posted in Misc)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

It fails the private key detection (patch pending), and the unicode test (bug report already filed). There are a lot of inconsistencies in the HTML tests: sometimes the HTML is stripped, sometimes it is encoded.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iD8DBQFIe6X914T0zKYaQO0RAtU5AJ42h4ai6D4pvDFFWCOwoJ2KOITFrQCcDARp
enE3iB8bSzjgTKFGXdWNIXA=
=02mX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2

(6 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

From what I understand, messages need to be sent using a specific format--simply including a PGP block in an email isn't the right way. Try sending an email using FireGPG's features to yourself (you will see new options in the Compose window).

3

(3 replies, posted in Misc)

http://cgamesplay.com/firegpg/tests/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've created the beginnings of a test suite for FireGPG. Ideally, this would be a wiki, but we'll use what we've got :)

The suite is available online at <http://cgamesplay.com/firegpg/tests/>. It includes several tests that don't yet pass.

This is a very primitive list of tests, but it should at least help prevent regression and such.

Also, my public key is at the end of this post. From now on, anything I do will be tied to this public key.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iD8DBQFIe14L14T0zKYaQO0RAg8GAJsE30hlz7a7NUsBJ3oEUVPiIWQHYwCgmiDn
PKtS7PBIoUR3c/BYTP6+zyY=
=VqkZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=7Cnc
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

4

(12 replies, posted in Bugs & problems)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alternatively, you can simply disable the inline detection. It's available on the General tab of the FireGPG options.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iD8DBQFIe1i814T0zKYaQO0RAktvAKCwLGutu/Egs8IpZ3TSGfTVWkZu1gCbBGc6
vLshP9c5LUiV3qz3OfNoBCo=
=RNzr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5

(1 replies, posted in Requests)

At least a year ago I looked to FireGPG to ease the use of GPG, but decided that the interface was too poor to use. I don't care about GMail integration, what I want is something more like this. Well, today I sat down and started coding. Presently, I have an extension that extracts PGP blocks in web pages, but doesn't yet do anything with them. I want to merge this into FireGPG to create a working web cryptography solution.

I haven't tried to merge them yet, and I've only taken a cursory glance at the code for FireGPG, but can anyone direct me where I should look to help me out? Thanks. I'd also be interested in hearing any other thoughts anyone had on the idea itself.